Diabetes Trials Should Include Patient Important Outcomes


According to results of a Mayo Clinic study published June 4 in JAMA, which analyzed results from more than 400 randomized clinical trials, less than one out of five included patient-important outcomes as primary endpoints. Victor Montori, M.D., a Mayo Clinic endocrinologist and the lead author of the study conducted at Mayo’s Knowledge and Encounter Research Unit , explains why failure to include outcomes patients would consider important is a significant shortcoming.

In the second clip, Dr. Montori further elaborates and describes the effect he hopes the Mayo Clinic study has in influencing the direction of clinical trials for diabetes treatments:

Update: This story was covered in the Rochester Post-Bulletin, Medical News Today (UK), and MedPage Today, as well as the Wall Street Journal Health Blog.

Add to FacebookAdd to DiggAdd to Del.icio.usAdd to StumbleuponAdd to RedditAdd to BlinklistAdd to Ma.gnoliaAdd to TechnoratiAdd to FurlAdd to Newsvine

This entry was posted in Diabetes & Endocrinology and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>